Talk:Mentem: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "==HoHS Jerbiton/Mentem expansion== The current text says that the HoHS expansion on mentem is "apocryphal". What's the basis for that statement? Why isn't it considered ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==HoHS Jerbiton/Mentem expansion== | ==HoHS Jerbiton/Mentem expansion== | ||
The current text says that the [[HoHS]] expansion on mentem is "apocryphal". What's the basis for that statement? Why isn't it considered canon? [[User:Inquisitive|Inquisitive]] ([[User talk:Inquisitive|talk]]) 20:43, 24 January 2013 (MST) | The current text says that the [[HoHS]] expansion on mentem is "apocryphal". What's the basis for that statement? Why isn't it considered canon? [[User:Inquisitive|Inquisitive]] ([[User talk:Inquisitive|talk]]) 20:43, 24 January 2013 (MST) | ||
It's an oblique reference to the fact that it's canon, but outside the core book. So you can play a "canonic" game without it, yet also with it, depending on whether your game includes HoHS or not. I think the text is clearer without it, and I removed it (and made a few minor other changes). [[User:Yair|Yair]] ([[User talk:Yair|talk]]) 07:06, 25 January 2013 (MST) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:06, 25 January 2013
HoHS Jerbiton/Mentem expansion
The current text says that the HoHS expansion on mentem is "apocryphal". What's the basis for that statement? Why isn't it considered canon? Inquisitive (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2013 (MST)
It's an oblique reference to the fact that it's canon, but outside the core book. So you can play a "canonic" game without it, yet also with it, depending on whether your game includes HoHS or not. I think the text is clearer without it, and I removed it (and made a few minor other changes). Yair (talk) 07:06, 25 January 2013 (MST)