User talk:IMHO: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:46, 7 June 2015

Welcome! Thanks for your contributions. -- Andrew Gronosky

Thanks for all your contributions! I'm sorry for not responding to all your recommendations and changes - my real-life doesn't allow me the time at the moment. I'll review and respond as needed (rename pages, delete them, and so on) as soon as a I can - which won't be in the next two weeks, I'm sorry to say.

I note that you asked for a picture of a book in one case - you can just download it from Atlas' site (we are allowed to use Atlas Games' website art; see Project Redcap:Copyrights#Permission to Use Artwork from Atlas Games Web Site) and (I believe you can) upload it here . You may want to give the file a name by adopting the naming convention used for other products.

Oh - and the abbreviation for The Mysteries Revised Edition is TMRE.

Yair 12:57, 15 October 2012 (MDT)

On the League of Gastronomers - do you mean that page should be merged with the League page? I think that's inappropriate, as then it will be the only League with some description. Yair 18:49, 1 November 2012 (MDT)

The correct format is Tribunals of Hermes: Rome, not Tribunals of Hermes Rome; as I see things, anyway, and from the names of other products. Yair 20:03, 3 November 2012 (MDT)

Note to self

Durenmar (under Andrew Smith) and other fansites.

Expand Suggested Reading and find more pages to link to it. Should be useful and readily available.

Deal with orphaned page Miscellaneous Links. Likely merge it.

Formatting help

I think it would be useful to move the formatting tips into the Help namespace. I created a (blank) page called Help:Basic formatting. If you agree this is a good location for your formatting advice, can you move the content to that location? We should also search for links to your user page and update the ones that point to formatting information.

Done. Andrew Gronosky 22 April 2013

Copyright Compliance

Thank you for pointing out the potential copyright violation on the page Incomprehensible Mystic (Template). I edited the page to remove some of the details, and the author followed my example of selective omission for the next page he created. So that matter was easily resolved. Andrew Gronosky 11 June 2013

The Maleficium

Oh, you are quite right. Thanks. LuisDantas (talk) 15:18, 14 July 2013 (MDT)

Houses Writeup

In regards to the House writeups: I think it'd be good for the House descriptions to have a list of official House NPCs, complete with the appropriate "faction" for each House. However, that's a lot of work, and isn't really necessary. If you want to, go ahead and do them - but I don't consider that necessary for a House description. A list of prominent NPCs, perhaps, is a necessity; a list of NPCs with factions is a bonus. Yair (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2015 (MDT)

Revision as of 11:45, 7 June 2015 (view source) Yair (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:46, 7 June 2015 (view source) Yair (talk \| contribs) (→‎Houses Writeup) Newer edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:
	== Houses Writeup ==		== Houses Writeup ==

	In regards to the House writeups: I think it'd be good for the House descriptions to have a list of official House NPCs, complete with the appropriate "faction" for each House. However, that's a lot of work, and isn't really necessary. If you want to, go ahead and do them - but I don't consider that necessary for a House description. A list of prominent NPCs, perhaps, is a necessity; a list of NPCs with factions is a bonus.		In regards to the House writeups: I think it'd be good for the House descriptions to have a list of official House NPCs, complete with the appropriate "faction" for each House. However, that's a lot of work, and isn't really necessary. If you want to, go ahead and do them - but I don't consider that necessary for a House description. A list of prominent NPCs, perhaps, is a necessity; a list of NPCs with factions is a bonus. [[User:Yair\|Yair]] ([[User talk:Yair\|talk]]) 11:46, 7 June 2015 (MDT)